The controversy was instant: before the referee Luis Lobo Medina point half of the field and give the goal to Central tentsit was already installed. Because players from Banfield claimed the position of Kevin Jappertauthor of the goal, while in the television broadcast they confirmed it advanced, with the repetition of the play, which uses the OUR.
It is the play in which Iván Tapia It makes a free kick and sends the ball to the area, where it connects head Dardo Miloc with response from Facundo Sanguinetti. Then, Kevin Jappert defines in the rebound. While there was VAR review, the referee validated so much Despite the advanced position of the goalas demonstrated by television repetition.
Almost three days later, the AFA released fragments of the audio that recorded the conversation between Lobo Medina, Fabricio Llobet from the VAR and Javier Mihura in the Avar. The confirmation of the goal occurs with the affirmation of the referee to the question they ask him from Ezeiza: “Cancha’s decision, goal?”, They ask him and he, from Sarandí, replied: “Yes.”