For the lawyer, these alleged errors would make it clear that the treatment was not fair or in accordance with the law, and he considered “that there was a prejudgment from the beginning of the case, as well as a marked lack of respect on the part of the magistrate who in “At all times he was directed in a derogatory manner towards the highest authority of the Church in the province of Salta, something he did not do with the rest of those involved in this process.”
“The situation was clearly not pleasant since what happened in the process was transmitted in a biased manner. It must be taken into consideration that it was publicly established that Monsignor was convicted of Violence, which did not happen,” he clarified, since these courts “do not have the power to condemn and investigate the truth of the facts” because they are Civil Justice. and not criminal.
“Gender Violence judges do not have sentencing powers and can only apply preventive measures, which is what ultimately happened,” he stressed.